tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post1073066493457130701..comments2011-12-09T00:42:19.568-08:00NerdWithNoLifenoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-81814971921539321012011-12-09T00:42:19.568-08:002011-12-09T00:42:19.568-08:00Youtube these days support 1080p videos, so there&#39;s no much concern about this anymore. Their sound quality has been standard too.home theatre brisbanehttp://www.livingsound.com.au/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-66164971434796348062009-03-10T22:50:00.000-07:002009-03-10T22:50:00.000-07:00Oh and thanks, Peter. I knew about &amp;fmt=18 but it didn&#39;t used to work within an annotation. Now it does, so that&#39;s definitely the easiest and most certain way to force a high quality video.Dereknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-20078073865330328412009-03-05T07:50:00.000-08:002009-03-05T07:50:00.000-08:00HQ is back... again. Well I'm off to run some more tests... again. Stay tuned.Dereknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-15119799326331214732009-03-04T12:17:00.000-08:002009-03-04T12:17:00.000-08:00Ahhh it seems there is a work around.<BR/><BR/>If you put a link in annotations at the start and add &amp;fmt=18 to the end of the url for the video viewers can click that and view your video in HQ.<BR/><BR/>HD take too long to buffer.Peterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10175044203072148664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-7939660321404448732009-03-04T06:23:00.000-08:002009-03-04T06:23:00.000-08:00So is there no way to get the "High Quality" video versus "HD"? I seem to like the former, as HD doesn't play well on my computer and I would imagine for others as well, so wish there was a middle ground for users.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-35245595901886241402009-03-02T12:43:00.000-08:002009-03-02T12:43:00.000-08:00HQ has pretty much been phased out. There's a link for "watch in HD," but "high quality" videos are very few if any. The good news is the normal quality videos are much better than they used to be. It's AVC, the type you'd find in an H.264 MP4.Dereknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-83283426233377816972009-02-28T03:16:00.000-08:002009-02-28T03:16:00.000-08:00I am having a few problems with my files I am uploading and stumbled on your blog.<BR/><BR><BR/>I am uploading files 720x404 and exporting from CS3 as an mpeg 2 with high quality and bit rate. <BR><BR/><BR/>The file uploads but is never in HQ, weird thing is I have uploaded 10 so far and only 1 converted to HQ.<BR/><BR/>I don't understand what I am doing wrong or is it youtube? I have left them up over 1 day now just in the hope that its youtube servers a bit behind but alas still no HQ.<BR/><BR><BR/>Any help would be appreciated.<BR/><BR/><BR><BR/>PeterPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10175044203072148664noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-9670259149787457842009-02-26T13:52:00.000-08:002009-02-26T13:52:00.000-08:00Audio still falls through the cracks. Currently the normal quality videos have stereo 64k AAC 22050Hz sound. If you want something better, you have to go either HQ or HD for stereo 128k AAC 44100Hz.Dereknoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6133785540334951464.post-34017356326498270172009-02-25T09:40:00.000-08:002009-02-25T09:40:00.000-08:00I don't care too much about the video quality. Good video quality is fine, but my main concern is sound quality for musicians. Must these two things go hand in hand? <BR/><BR/>I still need to study your course in this, but I would like to avoid the dual video effect that youtube uses. I only want one high quality video for sound. There is no point to have one video with lesser sound quality with a choice of another one with high sound quality sound, in my case.<BR/><BR/>Is this unavoidable? What are the possibilities?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com